It has been over three years since I offered $1,000 to anyone who could demonstrate that utilizing learning styles improved learning outcomes. Click here for the original challenge.
So far, no one has even come close.
For all the talk about learning styles over the last 15 years, we might expect that I was at risk of quickly losing my money.
Let me be clear, my argument is not that people don't have different learning styles, learning preferences, or learning skills. My argument is that for real-world instructional-development situations, learning styles is an ineffective and inefficient waste of resources that is unlikely to produce meaningful results.
Let me leave you with the original challenge:
"Can an e-learning program that utilizes learning-style information outperform an e-learning program that doesn't utilize such information by 10% or more on a realistic test of learning, even it is allowed to cost up to twice as much to build?"
The challenge is still on.
The problem isn't learning styles. The problem is that nobody could possibly satisfy the conditions of your contest.
For example, "The learning-style program must be created in an instructional-development shop that is dedicated to creating learning programs for real-world use. Programs developed only for research purposes are excluded."
That rules out pretty much 99.99 percent of the world.
Posted by: Stephen Downes | Wednesday, 30 September 2009 at 11:51 AM
Stephen,
No. That’s not true. Let me be clear. I’m skeptical that a real-world e-learning shop could create an e-learning program that utilizes learning styles. I don’t think it’s practically feasible. I don’t think clients will pay for the extra diagnostics, the extra development costs, and the extra threats to people’s personal privacy (because of the diagnostics). So, I want to specifically exclude programs that are created for academic purposes only. I want to exclude programs that are just created for research purposes—that have no other commercial purposes.
I would bet that over 90% of e-learning programs that are developed today are developed because the developer expects to get some sort of compensation for those programs. That’s a lot of programs that would meet the criteria for inclusion.
Posted by: Will Thalheimer | Wednesday, 30 September 2009 at 12:05 PM
By the way, for any elearning shop that wants to create a valid test of learning styles, I will provide free consulting to help them set up a valid test!!
Posted by: Will Thalheimer | Thursday, 01 October 2009 at 01:09 PM
Speaking of waste of resources, there is a linguering statement in our Evaluation CoP that holds that transfer of learning is more than 40% related to pre training conditions, less than 20% to training and more than 40% to post conditions (Robert O. Brinkerhoff of ASTD) . Though, it seems to make sense, the thought that follows is that it is a waste of resources to make changes to a training program, redirect its objectives or even bother with testing since its impact on transfer is negligible (others saying less than 12%). I still feel that, if performance gap is not bridged, cutting also any nice to know, orienting the objectives on the tasks and asking recall questions instead of reviews is worth the tweaking time. What do you think ?
Posted by: Diane Des Rochers | Thursday, 01 October 2009 at 02:41 PM
This is my third (or fourth) post on this topic, requesting what you actually mean by learning styles. I see so many variations, there is no blanket theory. I get annoyed by nay sayers who don't research the topic properly and make sweeping generalisations. I trust you're not one of them. I'll wait for a response.
Posted by: Julian King | Thursday, 22 April 2010 at 05:40 AM
I took my first loans when I was a teenager and this helped my business a lot. But, I need the small business loan once more time.
Posted by: STELLA26Randall | Friday, 03 September 2010 at 05:16 AM
Nice post !! Participants' ratings of the educational sessions directly reflected their learning styles. The LSI challenge provides educators with a method to move beyond recognition and understanding to "action" that empowers students.
Posted by: Home Protect Home Warranty | Thursday, 07 July 2011 at 03:23 AM
for his many years in leading the workplace learning
Posted by: Marc by Marc Jacobs Handbag | Thursday, 13 October 2011 at 05:49 AM