IBM's Watson beat two Jeopardy champs in answering questions this week.
Does this mean that soon computers will be able to replace people in answering questions? For us as workplace learning-and-performance professionals, does this mean we'll be doing less training of people, and more training of machines?
Probably depends on lots of things as to how soon this happens. For example, folks doing technical support probably won't be replaced as soon if the systems/equipment on which they are providing support are updated regularly or modified substantially.
Anyway, this will affect our field---indeed it is already affecting our field to some extent as computers already provide support for folks who are answering questions---but when this reaches a tipping point we'll just have to wait and see.
- Article in NYTimes
- NPR On Point Radio with Tom Ashbrook
This news can be interesting for many people. I'll advise to read this post to my friends.
Posted by: terracotta warrior replica | Wednesday, 20 April 2011 at 10:40 PM
depends on lots of things as to how soon this happens. For example, folks doing technical supportrtv5
Posted by: brülör servisi | Wednesday, 01 June 2011 at 03:21 AM
computers already provide support for folks who are answering questions---but when this reaches a tipping pointrew
Posted by: doğalgaz tesisatçısı | Wednesday, 01 June 2011 at 03:22 AM
we'll be doing less training of people, and more training of machinese4
Posted by: su tesisatçısı | Wednesday, 01 June 2011 at 03:25 AM
For us as workplace learning-and-performance professionals, does this mean we'll be doing less training of peoples4t6c
Posted by: escort izmir | Wednesday, 01 June 2011 at 03:26 AM
It's fascinating in my view that answers Watson thinks up are probabilistic queues not certain results of some analysis.
Posted by: Homesure Services | Sunday, 05 June 2011 at 08:33 AM
This is powerful stuff! Think of Watson applied to customer service situations in almost any domain. First it be becomes a call center tool. Next, it replaces 80% of the call center. Would you rather type your problems in to Watson and bounce to experts if necessary, or start with some random call center person?
Posted by: PetCareRx | Monday, 11 July 2011 at 02:52 AM
This is powerful stuff! Think of Watson applied to customer service situations in almost any domain. First it be becomes a call center tool. Next, it replaces 80% of the call center. Would you rather type your problems in to Watson and bounce to experts if necessary, or start with some random call center person?
Posted by: eBridge advertising | Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 05:41 AM
Thanks to Bill Ellet, editor of the unbiased Training Media Review, writes about the awards in our industry and how hopelessly biased and corrupt they are.
Posted by: pandora bracelets | Thursday, 04 August 2011 at 10:41 PM
this will affect our field---indeed it is already affecting our field to some extent as computers already provide support for folks who are answering questions---but when this reaches a tipping point we'll just have to wait and see.
Posted by: christian louboutin sale | Thursday, 04 August 2011 at 10:42 PM
Does this mean that soon computers will be able to replace people in answering questions? For us as workplace learning-and-performance professionals, does this mean we'll be doing less training of people, and more training of machines?
Posted by: ray ban | Thursday, 04 August 2011 at 10:44 PM
"Questi passi sono di solito causati in parte per mezzo di governo federale non può ottenere il loro reagire prada borse a vicenda ", Romney segnalato. "Abbiamo un esecutivo molto maggiori che non è riuscita ad avere la testa con noi di smettere di sprecare oltre richiede in" Romney riferito che quando il vostro cane compie piccole imprese padroni, che spesso gli dicono che vogliono il governo del Costa Rica che si "lasciare solo gli individui
Posted by: louis vuitton borse | Friday, 12 August 2011 at 05:38 AM
Well, I don't thinks so ,I think he will stick up...
Posted by: pellet mill | Tuesday, 16 August 2011 at 05:53 AM
Thanks to Bill Ellet, editor of the unbiased Training Media Review, writes about the awards in our industry and how hopelessly biased and corrupt they are.
Posted by: thomas sabo | Thursday, 18 August 2011 at 09:42 PM
Its really exciting for IBM.The IBM scientists demonstrated silicon nanophotonic delay line that was used to buffer over a byte of information encoded in optical pulses - a requirement for building optical buffers for on-chip optical communications.Really genius....!!!!
Posted by: chapter 7 bankruptcy filing | Sunday, 21 August 2011 at 04:32 AM